Ghalib’s Birth Anniversary

December 27 is Mirza Ghalib’s birth anniversary. To pay homage to Mirza Ghalib, the greatest ghazal-go in history I have attempted to say a ghazal in his style.

غزل عالَم  شگفتہ ہو کہ  میں آفت رسیدہ  ہوں          اس دشتِ بےسپرمیں جوں صیدِجریدہ ہوں
ڈرتا رہا  میں  راندہ ء رضواں  کے نیش سے           ہاے  ستم  تو دیکھ  کہ  مردم گزیدہ  ہوں
آ  عندلیب  مل   کے   کریں   نالہ   زاریاں           میں  بھی تو باغبانِ چمن سے  رنجیدہ  ہوں
ہے  میری  کوتہ دستی کہ  انکے بلند بخت             اس  بیدلی و شرم  سے  ہی آب دیدہ  ہوں
تو ہی بتا میں کیسے تیرے در کا نام  لوں            ہراک سمجھ رہا ہے کہ مجنوں شوریدہ ہوں
اشرف یہاں تو  بات  بھی کرنی  ہے  نا روا      چپ  رہ اسی گماں میں  زبان ِ بُریدہ         ہوں                                      (اشرف)

History of Knowledge-Explosions — Part II

Shared by Mirza Iqbal Ashraf:

History of Knowledge-Explosions — Part II

Post Greek Period of Knowledge

 

ABSTRACT: There have been two “Knowledge-Explosions.” In between these two periods of knowledge-explosions, there was a period of progression of knowledge, contributed partly by the Romans, but conspicuously developed by the Muslim philosophers, and scientists which made an enduring effect upon Western thinkers. The modern world is indebted to the Muslims not only for the revival of Classical Greek knowledge, but also to their own contribution to social and general sciences which helped in bringing about the European Renaissance. However, contribution by the Romans in laying the foundation of “philosophy of humanism” is a unique achievement which arose first with Cicero (106-43 BCE) and was developed by the thinkers of the Italian Renaissance in the 14th century. The Romans were proud of their “love of law.” For them their ancient customs and traditions codified into a unified law was the lifeblood of their empire. Throughout their empire, from England to Black Sea and from Spain to Egypt, one law ruled all men. … They, instead of promoting philosophy and science, were more interested in building roads to connect every region of their empire. They used arches not only for temples and amphitheaters but also for bridges and aqueducts which made possible to bring water from faraway mountains. … This does not mean that the Romans did not play their part in preserving Greek knowledge. They did translate Greek philosophy, plays, and many literary works of the classical Greek authors and thinkers into Latin. … However, the Romans were more concerned about establishing a strong state than promoting philosophical and scientific knowledge. But they spread the educational ideas of the Greeks and translated their know-how in the fields of ceramics, metallurgy, alchemy and many more themes into Latin. But they lacked interest in science and technology and thus did not contribute to any useful scientific invention and technological innovation. ~ MIRZA ASHRAF.

To read full article please go to my page: https://independent.academia.edu/MirzaAshraf

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Pain-Streaked Optimism of an American Muslim

The Pain-Streaked Optimism of an American Muslim

By Rajia Hassib

A mosque in Bowling Green, Ohio. September, 2004.Credit Photograph by Thomas Dworzak/Magnum

My daughter, with her usual teen-age intensity, comes home and tells me of a boy at school who made an ISIS joke, and of another boy who teasingly accused a girl of being a terrorist for loosely wrapping a scarf around her head. My daughter is especially mortified for a Muslim friend, who was within earshot and who, unlike her, wears a headscarf. I assure her that it’s O.K., that her friend probably didn’t hear him and that, even if she did, she may not have been that affected by his words. I know the girl, a levelheaded sophomore at my daughter’s public high school, kind and calm. I hope my words are true because, even as I speak them, I struggle to maintain my composure.

None of this is particularly new. Life as a Muslim in post-9/11 America is often an exercise in resilience. But I thought I had developed thicker skin by now, if only through repeated exposure to grief. I’ve been following news of terrorist attacks for years, and my reaction has always been the same: pain for the victims, anger with the terrorists, and fear of the inevitable backlash. The repetitiveness of these emotions is exhausting. Every time I hear of a new terrorist attack—Paris, San Bernardino—I feel like I’ve been through all of this before, several times too often. It’s like being stuck in a time loop in Dante’s Inferno, where Virgil guides me, again and again, through the seventh circle of Hell, home to the violent and the blasphemous. With each lull in terrorist activity, I hope that I may graduate to the next two circles and, eventually, hopefully, to Purgatory, but then something else happens and we’re back to circle seven.

But my daughter’s story brings me a fresh pain, for this time the wave of Islamophobia has been caused not only by terrorist attacks but also by the rhetoric of almost every Republican Presidential candidate. Now American Muslims are being vilified by their fellow Americans, and have to face the added pain of a rejection that stings of betrayal. I hear Donald Trump speak and I mumble that this should not be happening. Not here, not to me, and certainly not to my kids, who were born and raised here.

I came to the U.S. when I was twenty-three. My husband and I, both Egyptians, landed at J.F.K. with one suitcase each and two sets of dreams: his was to become an American-trained doctor, and mine was to become a writer. I think back on both of us, in our twenties, armed with the infinite optimism only immigrants can embrace. Everything seemed so simple. This was America. Here, if you had a dream you worked for it, and more often than not it came true.

It would be years before I would learn the term for what we were pursuing: the American Dream. By then, I was in my thirties, sitting in a college class, back at school to abandon my B.A. in architecture, earned in Egypt, in favor of a B.A., and then an M.A., in English. In college, I read “The Great Gatsby” and “Death of a Salesman,” and I came home to my husband one night and told him all about the American Dream’s potential for disillusionment, about the perils of pursuing a mirage or, worse, something that promises happiness without realizing that this particular happiness was not what one needed or wanted.

My husband looked at me as if I were being blasphemous. “The American Dream is true,” he claimed. “Just look at us.”

By then, he had finished his medical training and started his own practice. I was well on my way to earning both of my degrees in English, and it was only a few years before my first novel would be published. Both of our dreams did, indeed, come true, even my audacious one of publishing a novel in English when my native language was Arabic. Of course we both believed in the limitless possibilities of the American Dream.

Of course, we are both Muslims. When Trump speaks of a national registry for Muslims, of closing down mosques, of banning Muslim travel to the U.S., what I hear is this: “You are an outsider. You will remain an outsider. You will die an outsider. You will never be one of us.”

At some point, while I was earning my degrees and writing my novel, I became the Other. And here I had believed that I was a fully integrated, good American citizen, rejoicing in my achievements, thankful, every day, for what this country has given me. My American heart bleeds.

My Muslim heart is equally pained. Growing up in a liberal, not particularly religious household, I read the Qur’an on my own for the first time when I was twelve. I fell in love with the beautiful, soothing language, and with a God who, above all, promises mercy: who proclaims that taking one life equals the murder of all humanity, and that saving one life equals the saving of all. I have since reread the Qur’an about once every year, and as I grew older I also fell in love with the idea of a deity who communicates with people through words, who sends his worshippers a text and leaves them free to interpret it.

Free will, as Milton’s “Paradise Lost” has taught me, can be tricky. It can allow evil to happen, but it also shows a tremendous degree of respect for the human intellect. We are deemed intelligent enough to think independently. In fact, we are encouraged to do so; a quick search reveals that the command “strive to understand” is repeated in various forms in the Qur’an at least twenty-four times, including, in some instances, in the exasperated form of “Have you no sense?” The Qur’an reveals a God who assumes that we have an intellect and urges us to use it. He obviously takes a risk, but, more important, He respects our capacity for thought.

So when Mike Huckabee declares that Muslims leave Friday prayer as “uncorked animals” and that Islam “promotes the most murderous mayhem on the planet,” I am deeply pained. This Islamophobic rhetoric stings not only in its insult to my religion but also in the humiliating tone it takes when speaking of me and my fellow Muslims. If God has condescended to respect my capacity for thought, I would assume that Republican Presidential candidates would not find themselves above offering me the same courtesy. Instead, so many of them claim or imply that any Muslim can be brainwashed into becoming a terrorist, willfully ignoring the fact that if all 1.6 billion of us were as violent as they claimed the world would have ended a long time ago, and we would all have been having these conversations as we awaited our turn to be sorted into our eternal abodes in Heaven or Hell. That kind of rhetoric is unfair.

And yet, I cannot help but remain hopeful. You may assume that I’ve resorted to hopefulness as a means to self-preservation, and you would probably be right. As an immigrant, I do need to believe that the one decision that set the course of my entire life was the correct one. As a parent, I cling to the hope that my kids will not have to face religious persecution and discrimination, because believing otherwise would be unbearable. As a Muslim, I can testify that surviving in the U.S. under the current political conditions requires almost as much optimism as believing in the American Dream does.

For full article, please click

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-pain-streaked-optimism-of-an-american-muslim?

Evolution of Religions

Shared by Dr. Syed Ehtisham

Human beings are understood to have evolved to the current
brain size about half a million years ago, ​enabling them to have​ bipedal
locomotion, coherent speech, power of analysis, greater social
organization, and imagination.
The earliest available record and evidence​ are of female
dominated hunter-gatherer society, evolving over​ thousands of years into
tribal, feudal-monarchical-mercantile and capitalist stages.
Over time, the concept of divine developed and​ passed through
the stage​s​ of polytheism, which ​initially​ had more or less equal
representation of male and female forms. With the advent of agricultural
mode of production, matriarchal society gave way to male domination.  ​
Initially gods were believed to be just more powerful beings
than humans, but over time they grew more and more distant and different
from the ordinary mortal. Bhagwan among Hindus was initially head of the
tribe who gave away ‘Bhag (portion). Monotheistic creeds followed, which
conforming to the norms of the time, had only male Gods .Initially the
monotheistic God kept close personal relations with the prophets. God of
Moses (He had actually to compete with and overcome rivals) used to invite
him for regular parleys. Jesus did not talk to him directly and his
followers were reduced to award​​ him a biological relationship with the
Almighty. The prophet of Islam had only one audience when he rose to the
seventh heaven on a flying horse named “Burraq”; Archangel Gabriel was the
appointed emissary for all exchanges.
Accounts of the earliest beliefs and their origin are ​at
best​ speculative. Humans needed explanation of and protection from natural
elements. It was probably a coincidence that a prediction of member of a
tribe came true; drought ended or the crop was good or a fire died down.
The person, pushed to explain how she/he knew, might have claimed a special
relationship with gods. The profession of clergy probably started that way.
People saw other people die. It made them wonder about their own
death. At the deepest subconscious they thought of their personal unknown
future. The unknown ​was pregnant with curiosity and fear.​
Individuals with perceived​ access to the ‘divine’ explained the future on
the basis of their inner experience. They gave their views to humankind
about virtue and vice, about heaven and hell, about salvation and
damnation; ​a concept named Faith for a collectively peaceful co-existence.
​Thus religions were created.
Priests were close to the spiritual personages. They interpret and
propagate the teachings of the ‘divine’.  They exercise the greatest
influence upon devout believers.
With advancement of knowledge and ability to
explain many​ natural phenomena​​ on scientific and rational basis, it
became necessary to invent the ultimate unknown which was the first cause,
the un-created creator; we have the God of Abraham, Moses, Jesus and
Muhammad, peace be upon all of them.
Conformists, challenged by detractors, claim that religion
inspired people and offers solace, when nothing else could. Well opium is a
great analgesic; further it can be chemically changed into morphine which
is an even better pain reliever. But it can be converted into Heroin as
well, which is highly addictive. Obviously opium production has to  be
regulated but you can not trust an addict as a regulator. The question
arises; why trust the clergy, mullahs, pundits and rabbis to regulate
religious practices