Spirituocracy in the Era of Singularity and AI’s Cyber War

Spirituocracy in the Era of

Singularity and AI’s Cyber War

A turning point in the history of humankind is at hand as

Artificial Intelligence and Robotics are ready to define

The merger of man and machine. Spirituality will

Redefine what it means to be human!

(Ashraf)

Human life, in the era of Singularity is about to be remade, and redefined by the artificial intelligence regarding “what it means to be human.” It will be a period when AI will pose many seen and unseen challenges to mankind’s survival as ‘truly human beings.’ There will be a big break through when the natural intelligence (NI) is unshackled from human being’s biological limitations the artificial intelligence (AI) will scale up its process capability as it sees fit. This will be an era of the Humanoid Robots, ushering an era when individuality will lose its biologically defined boundaries  (biologically defined boundaries of humans could be explained with the help of poem of Rumi about evolution of humans) as AI would be able to freely copy and reconfigure themselves overpowering the biological-sapiens.

Today, the Robots are no longer just the stuff of science fiction. As robotics-engineers are forecasting that there are an endless number of things to discover in robotics. Exploring the most advanced Robotics in today’s world, shows that technologies are pushing fast forward the performances of machines, which a mesmerizing breakthrough is turning unbelievable into reality. Some process information faster than human brain, while others demonstrate exceptional precision and autonomy. Development of the drones, hypersonic missiles, and the rise of cyber weapons, cheap to acquire easy to deny, and useable for a variety of malicious purposes, has transformed geopolitics of war and peace like nothing since the invention of nuclear weapons. The coming security threat to the humankind is “cyber war” more than the nuclear war.

On May 6, 2025 war started between India and Pakistan. India targeted 6 places—3 mosques and 3 open ground. Pakistan downed 5 Indian fighter jets, 4-Rafael and 1-Mig and targeted a military Brigade HQ in Kashmir. On May 7, drones attacks started from both sides. On May 8, dozens of drones fired from both sides—Pakistan using Turkish made drones while India used Israeli made drones. On May 9, Pakistan started a response to the Indians, ascribing it operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos and the cyber-war started from Pakistani sides. The same day President Trump brokered a cease fire accepted by both sides. An online video related the story of the conflict between India and Pakistan turning into a cyber-war—which I watched on TV News Channel GEO Pakistan as being related live by Lt General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry director general of ISPR—as here:

What if a nation’s power trains and secrets vanished in seconds without a single bullet fired. This was not a movie it was an opening blow with a real cyber war in the dead of night India’s capital was quiet government buildings dim the lights emails hummed in silence but something unseen was tearing through the digital sky. This wasn’t a drill, it was operation Bunyan un Marsoos a silent strategic cyber assault carried out by Pakistan’s elite cyber command known only as the shadows in seconds. India’s most secure data defense intelligence collection files, economic secrets was breached; 507 high value systems frozen, experts stared in shock of screens turned to static, message received this is only a digital strike and real war still coming.

May 10, 2025, Islamabad said that in response to Indian attack Pakistan launched a major military campaign, “Operation Bunyan un Marsoos” (Arabic بنيان مرصوص for “a solid cemented structure” or “a wall made of lead or iron.”) targeting at least six Indian military bases with AI guided hypersonic missiles. The commander in chief of Pakistan, (Hafiz) Syed Muhammad Asim Munir who had memorized the Qur’an and as “truly spiritual” was leading the army of “spiritual fighters, air force pilots, and naval forces.” The name Bunyan-un-Marsoos from the Qur’an’s Surah As-Saff, 61:4, was not chosen randomly. It was chosen for Religious Symbolism, as using a Qur’anic phrase gives the operation a “spiritual tone.” It suggests that the action is not just military, but also a “divine duty”or “holy mission” and a message of “strength, unity and spiritual wisdom.” The same video kept on relating the cyber war:

But it didn’t stop there; first target scanner networks and difficult backbone of India’s infrastructure cover grits, water control industrial plants all compromised and 70% of north India went dark over 50 million citizens without electricity, fires in power plants water pumps dead even hospitals and airports fell back on backup systems. Then came strike 2 Indian Railway trains halted 2900 plus locomotive stranded, signals failed 12 trains narrowly avoided catastrophe and the cost millions lost in cargo disruption.

Pakistani commander—not a follower of Kurzweilian “man merged machine”–but guided by his spiritual wisdom was intelligently using the AI and its created drones, missiles, aircrafts, and naval war machinery, as tools under his control. The operation continued:

Strike 3, Indian’s smart energy grid wind farms in Gujarat, power grids in Delhi, substations in Kashmir hacked, shutdown and burned down. Transformers exploding, generators failed and cities collapsed into darkness but the most terrifying part this wasn’t chaos this was precision. The cyber war designed not just to break hardware but to break moral to expose vulnerabilities remind the world that battle field moved beyond borders into network’s servers and minds operation Bunyan wasn’t just a strike, it was a message if we can touch your core in silence imagine what comes next.

Welcoming the new age of warfare where data bleeds and shadows strike, the myth of AI and its warfare machines proved just tools for the spiritual commander who was raised from the rank of a General to Field Marshal Syed Muhammad Asim Munir. President Donald Trump invited the Pakistani Field Marshal for one hour’s lunch meeting with him at Washington D.C., which lasted for three hours.   

Taking “Humanoid-Robots” plunging biologically evolved humans in misconception that these are just tools or machines to help them, it is important to understand that they’re early pioneers of a new era; redefining how we will work, live, and think about machines. From labs to factories, and even hospitals, the AI powered machines are changing industries and challenging our understanding of what’s possible. Though these machines plugged in AI, performing complex tasks are also going to change the sociopolitical system of mankind, the vision of spiritual democracy by the great poets of spiritual life, will be re-defined as “Robotics democracy”—government of the Robots, for the Robots, by the Robots. Then the sociopolitical discipline of Spirituocracy—the ultimate form of spiritual democracy—will play an important role in meeting with the challenges of the thinking machines by using them as their tool, ushering a spiritual life in the ‘world soul.’

Remaining focused on spiritual intelligence’s ethics, morality and compassion, Spirituocracy will be savior of “man as truly human.” During the expected IT and AI based globalization era, Spirituocracy will help in achieving a greater multi-cultural relativity in the form of “Spiritual Socio-global Wholeness.” Human mind, being a part of greater consciousness which is for many thinkers “Divine-imaged” and seems impossible to be digitized, will help the truly humans to have no other choice to switch over to a common discipline of Spirituocracy, to stay timelessly above the Siliconian challenges. The rationalists believe that human mind being part of a cosmic consciousness is “Cosmic-imaged” rather than “Divine-imaged.” They suggest the concept of a “Cosmic interconnectedness” which implies that human consciousness is intricately linked with the universe, reflecting its patterns, rhythms, and possibly even its fundamental nature. Since the concept of “Cosmic-imaged” instead of “Divine-imaged” leans towards a more philosophical or scientific understanding of the universe, rather than a strictly spiritual one. It can be digitized and ultimately become a part of Kurzweilian predicted “man-merged” machines.  A Spirituocracy is a system where governance is guided by spiritual principles and by the leaders possessing spiritual wisdom, which can neither be digitized nor be a feature of a no-biological machine.

Since merging of man and machine is a central feature of Singularity, modern democracies being governance by the people through elected representatives, decision-making often depends upon the majority votes and pragmatic considerations. Since the majority of the Singularitarians would not be a body of ‘truly humans’ the democratic rules, regulations and decisions will be worse than the decision of 500 democratic-jury faced by Socrates. Thus, whereas the democracies derive authority from the people who would be machine-merged, Spirituocracy will derive authority from spiritual people led by the spiritual leaders.

MIRZA IQBAL ASHRAF

Halton Arp and the Fight for our Living Universe

Halton Arp and the Fight for our Living Universe

An RTF Class

Is there reason to believe that the Big Bang which most scientists believe kick started the universe as we know it 13.7 billion years ago, may not be true?

In this Rising Tide Foundation lecture, I take the opportunity to introduce some competing alternatives to Big Bang Cosmology and standard model quantum mechanics which takes into account a broader spectrum of empirical data derived from the pioneering work of astronomer Halton Arp (1927-2013), and many other scientists whose names have been forgotten or obscured for purely political motives.

The question of the intersection of cellular biology, environmental science and galaxy formation is also investigated with a focus upon the nature of MIND and LIFE as principles organizing living space time.

To watch the video, please click on the hyperlink below:

Halton Arp and the Fight for our Living Universe – Matt Ehret’s Insights (substack.com)

.

An Interview with Richard Ebright: How Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins “systematically thwarted” the US Gain-of-Function Research Pause

Published on (Wednesday, March 24th, 2021) by Independent Science News
An Interview with Richard Ebright: How Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins “systematically thwarted” the US Gain-of-Function Research Pause

Interviewed by Jorge Casesmeiro Roger
https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/an-interview-with-richard-ebright-anthony-fauci-francis-collins-systematically-thwarted/
Synopsis: In this exclusive and wide-ranging interview with Prof. Richard Ebright, the long-time critic of risky pathogen research is asked about the merits of the WHO investigation, its personnel, and its forthcoming report.

The interview also asks about Gain-of-Function (GoF) research and the surprising silence of the Cambridge Working Group. In the interview Dr Ebright describes how US scientific leaders deliberately circumvented the GoF research pause placed on them. The directors of NIAID and NIH even stymied risk benefit assessment of such research.
Please share if you find this to be useful.

Yours sincerely,

Jonathan Latham, PhD
Executive DirectorThe Bioscience Resource Project, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA

2020 USA presidential election: Was science on the ballot?

[Jan] Was science on the ballot?

Message Body

An email received by Thinkers Forum USA :

{Email posted with hyper link as is}

A rare recent ray of light from Science magazine, from Sheila Jasanoff and others:
“The pandemic has seen much hand-wringing about Americans’ unwillingness to “accept science” and follow public health directives…….It is tempting to treat matters of health, safety, and environmental policy as if they are primarily about facts, because this transforms intractable social disputes into seemingly answerable technical questions. But such moves are inimical to democracy. When the key issue is who decides, acting as if disagreements are mainly about evidence is bad politics and bad social science. It turns expertise into an object of distrust and exacerbates American culture’s tendency to alienate people from the perceived elitism of science (2). This creates fertile ground for alternative facts and conspiracy theories that reframe problems and relocate the focus of blame.

Science advice thus occupies a precarious position on the boundary between asserting facts and making policy. It faces the structural problem of being authoritative without becoming authoritarian. It divides power between scientists, who are mainly accountable to their peers, and authorized political representatives, who are accountable to the citizens they serve. This allocation of authority is fundamentally political, even constitutional. We should not be surprised if expert advisers find their claims being questioned, given their consequential role in contemporary governance.”
Worth reading in full and digesting at length IMO. Its at:
https://compcore.cornell.edu/science2021/

Jonathan
Jonathan Latham, PhD
Executive DirectorThe Bioscience Resource Project, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA