” Governor Andrew Cuomo” By F. Sheikh

New York State suffered the most during current Covid-19 crisis, but it was fortunate to have steady, far-sighted and disciplined leadership. Governor Cumo’s daily biefings were watched ritually at national level to get reliable and science-based information. His briefings became even more significant in the face of chaotic and confusing information coming out of White House.He explained data in simple understandable language. He explained why following preventive measures such as mask and social distancing is necessary to stop the spread of corona virus. It not only protects you but also your loved ones and fellow citizens. He has navigated the New York skilfully during these difficult times and is now opening the businesses based on scientific data. He is moving very methodically. He skilfully avoided confrontation with Trump. His recent statements on police brutality and racism are very thoughtful. We are looking at making of a national leader and future presidential candidate.

However, despite his strong performance during the current crisis, he has shown some weaknesses. He continues to dwell on his petty dispute with Mayor DeBlazio. He does not rise above it and spares no opportunity to put Mayor down. Governor Cuomo was late than California to lockdown New York.He blames everyone else, including media, WHO, and CDC for not giving early warnings. California has same information as New York, but California locked down few days early than New York and has far less fatalities despite having double the population as compared to New York. Sometimes, selfishly he even provides cover to President Trump for his failure to take early preventive measure because it also helps him in giving similar excuses. 

New Yorkers are willing to forget some of Governor Cuomo’s missteps, but he needs to rise above petty fights and learn how to respond to constructive criticism. He has a great potential to be a future national leader.

“Freedom of Speech & Donald Trump” Brief Thought by F. Sheikh

Social Media sites are struggling how to handle some of Donald Trump’s misleading, outright false, and sometime violence inciting posts. Twitter and Snapchat have started to flag some of the postings but Facebook is refusing so far to censor or flag any of the Trump’s postings.

Freedom of Speech protected under 1st Amendment applies only to Government and not private entities or individuals. It bars government to censor or bar any speech with few exceptions such as obscenity and speech that incites imminent lawless action.

When private entities like Twitter flag or restrict certain speech, they are also exercising their freedom of speech right to restrict certain postings as they see fit according to their own policy or morals. However, as a business, it is a slippery slope from public relations point of view because they may be perceived as siding with one political side or the other. Facebook’s position, although hated by many, is the proper approach. If Trump is posting lies on Facebook, others have equal access to post the truth in reply and let the readers decide. Ironically, in all this saga, it is President Trump who is violating the 1st Amendment by signing executive order to take away protections for content posted on social media sites

“President Obama & Police Reforms” Brief Thought by F. Sheikh

Today president Obama addressed the young people. As a great leader, he gave the young people hope and a road map to bring about long needed police reforms. He tried to channel the anger in streets to bring about a change by peaceful means. He pointed out that police force is mostly controlled at local levels by Mayors and County Executives which are elected offices. During Obama Administration a commission formulated a police reform report which was not implemented by many local communities. He suggested to use voting power at local level and hold local Mayors and County Executives accountable to implement police reform commission report. That is where the solution lies.

It was a great speech and highlighted how badly we are lacking a true leadership in current administration which can bring country together, give a hope, and reassure by pointing a path to better days ahead.

Report 21st Century Policing

Anti-Communist win in Indonesia was more important to Washington than Vietnam

Massacres Killed Indonesia’s Hopes for National Liberation and Socialism.

(Worth reading historic perspective by Vincent Bevin in Jacobian on anti-communist purge in Indonesia-f.sheikh).

“This is not really what you asked, but I think the real legacy of our “anti-communist crusade,” as I put it, is not so much domestic as it defined our geopolitical position, our relation to the rest of the world. And for that, it was everything. I think Odd Arne Westad is right to say that much of the global system was hammered out in “Cold War” conflicts, and this is probably the most extensive and robust global system in planetary history.”

What inspired you to write this book?VB

I arrived in Jakarta, Indonesia, in 2017, to cover all of Southeast Asia for the Washington Post. First, it became very clear right away that the ghosts of the 1965 massacre lurked right below the surface no matter where I looked. It totally reshaped everything but was never spoken about candidly. And second, when I would tell people outside the region about what happened, they would invariably react with shock and interest. The mass killings in Indonesia were maybe the biggest “victory” for the West in the entire Cold War. It was, in fact, far more important for Washington to win here than in Vietnam. The United States assisted in the intentional murder of approximately 1 million innocent people. And third, I found out there were lots of unexpected connections to countries like Brazil, Chile, and Guatemala that I know well and where I could really add something. So I felt I had no choice.

How exactly was the conflict in Indonesia more important than the Vietnam War?VB

Indonesia is the fourth-largest country in the world by population. Within the “domino theory,” it was by far the biggest domino — it had nearly three times as many people as Vietnam. In the early 1960s, everyone in the US foreign-policy establishment recognized it was more important than Vietnam as a foreign-policy issue, as Sukarno was a founding leader of the Third World movement. The Vietnam War dominated US domestic politics for many years, but geopolitically, it achieved exactly nothing. Indonesia 1965–66 changed everything.BF

The event at the heart of your book is a mass extermination campaign directed against the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI), at the time the largest communist party outside of China and the Soviet Union. How was the party so successful and seen as such a threat to the United States’ interests?VB

The PKI was the oldest communist party in Asia, founded before the Chinese Communist Party, and from the beginning, it was committed to collaboration with “national-bourgeois” forces. They were two-stage revolutionaries that only wanted to transition to socialism way in the future, after the full development of capitalism. It was very moderate compared to what English speakers think of when they hear “communist” today.

In China, the Comintern actually instructed Mao to collaborate with the Nationalists because Moscow wanted the Chinese to replicate the success Indonesian communists had working with Muslim groups. It didn’t work out so well for Mao, but the PKI stayed more or less on this path throughout its entire existence. After Sukarno and revolutionary forces expelled the Dutch in 1949, the PKI became one part of a new, independent multiparty democracy.

President Sukarno, the country’s independence hero and founding father, was not a communist. But he was a left-leaning anti-imperialist, governing in coalition with a lot of different forces. The Indonesian communists did not have weapons and didn’t even contemplate the possibility of armed struggle. Even American officials noted at the time that they were simply a really well-run organization — they had very popular cultural programs and peasant organizations and a huge feminist base, and they didn’t suffer from rampant corruption like everybody else. But they got more and more votes, which did not please Washington — so the United States tried two stop them in two ways, which both failed.

First, they started pumping cash into a more conservative Muslim party. Then, in 1958, CIA pilots bombed Indonesia, killing civilians, in an attempt to break up the country. That year, British intelligence noted that the PKI would get first place in elections. But despite the Communists’ protests, there weren’t any more elections, and PKI stuck to supporting Sukarno as, at the other end of the political spectrum, there was the US-trained and US-supplied military waiting in the wings.BF

Part of the story you are telling here is about how a generation dreamed of a better world. Can you talk a bit about what inspired this generation and the significance of these dreams today.

Full article