(Worth reading article on Palestinian issue. f.sheikh)
Hannah Arendt points out that with regard to the Nazis this policy of denaturalizing people, or leaving them without citizenship rights, was a demonstration project. That is to say the Nazis began by thinking that Gypsies and Jews and other groups are flotsam and the scum of the earth and a kind of infection in the body politic, and by taking away their citizenship, they demonstrated that they’re scum. So Goebbels said that depriving the Jews of citizenship made the Jews the scum of the earth and he said, you know, let’s see – everybody’s criticizing us how we treat our Jews, but will they take them? Does America want them? Does Britain want them? And of course they didn’t once they were stateless. So by marking them as non-German as taking away German Jews’ citizenship, the Nazis were then demonstrating the wothlessness of their Jews….
I want to make an argument
about the character of the Palestine issue. I’m not going to argue that it’s a
unique problem but I am going to argue that it’s almost unique in contemporary
affairs, and that there are some aspects of it that explain why it is so
seemingly intractable. I’m going to start with an increasingly important field
of study, citizenship studies. There are journals now devoted to it; it’s
become a big thing in academia. My colleague at the University of Michigan,
Margaret Somers, wrote an important book on citizenship not so long ago. And as
she points out, Chief Justice Earl Warren of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1958
wrote: “Citizenship is man’s basic right, for it is nothing less than the right
to have rights. Remove this priceless possession and there remains a stateless
person disgraced and degraded in the eyes of his countrymen.” So Warren is
drawing here implicitly on the work of Hannah Arendt but this is the key point
that I want to make today. Citizenship is the right to have rights. People who
lack citizenship in a state ipso facto have no right to have rights ….
If we came to the Palestinians, their
situation of citizenship is obviously deformed. There’s no state. They’re
lacking an entire section of the column. And then their market is not very
robust and of course in Gaza there is no market to speak of, the Israelis have
Gaza under siege. There’s no airport, there’s no harbor, and the Israelis don’t
permit the Palestinians in Gaza to export most of what they make, some
strawberries, off of which the Israelis take a cut. But mostly the export
market doesn’t exist in Gaza. So the market and the separation wall and the
politics of the neighboring states are such that the Palestinians don’t have a
strong relationship to the market, they don’t have a state at all, there are a
lot of NGOS, and so for the Palestinians, the NGO sector is the one place where
there’s a little glimmer maybe of some citizenship. But that’s weird. And
that’s unexampled in the world. There’s no other group of people that look like
that. In the world, right now…
So when
you’re stateless, you don’t have the right to have rights. So everything is
unstable. It’s a little bit like being a child of an alcoholic abusive family.
They suffer from everything always being interrupted. You never know what’s
going to happen, you can’t make plans, let’s go for a picnic today but then the
picnic doesn’t happen because the parent got drunk. Well, if you’re stateless
you don’t really know what’s going to happen to you. Your property is unstable,
your rights are unstable. Even if you were stateless and you get citizenship,
your citizenship is unstable. So Jordan gave citizenship to the West Bank
Palestinians at one point and then because of the Rabat Accords after Israel
conquered it, they took the Jordanian citizenship back away. They just
denaturalized about 30 or 40 thousand Palestinians from Gaza in Jordan.
I don’t think that the world will put up with Apartheid forever. So there will be increasing boycotts, increasing pressure, increasing economic problems. Ultimately it seems to me very likely that you end up with a single state. I’m not arguing for it, I’m not saying it’s desirable, I’m not saying it’s the best outcome but I think somebody has to give citizenship to the Palestinians. Increasingly, the only one that could plausibly do that is the Israelis and the Israelis increasingly own all of Palestinian territory so they’re responsible for the people that live on that territory even though they don’t think they are. I don’t really care how this problem is solved, from my point of view, it’s all the same to me. The important thing, as you can tell is that I insist, the Palestinians must end up with the right to have rights.
Full article