Muslims Of Early America By PETER MANSEAU

IT was not the imam’s first time at the rodeo.

Scheduled to deliver an invocation at the Fort Worth Stock Show and Rodeo last week, Moujahed Bakhach of the local Islamic Association of Tarrant County canceled his appearancebecause of the backlash brought on by a prayer he had offered a few days before. The imam had been asked to confer a blessing on horses, riders and members of the military. He was met with gasps from the audience and social media complaints: “Outraged at a Muslim prayer at an all American event!” “Cowboys don’t want it!”

Vocal anti-Islamic sentiment is undergoing a revival. Four days before the imam’s canceled benediction, protesters at the State Capitol in Austin shouted down Muslim speakers, 

claiming Texas in the name of Jesus alone. In North Carolina two weeks earlier, Duke University’s plan to broadcast a Muslim call to prayer was abandoned amid threats of violence. Meanwhile Gov. Bobby Jindal, Republican of Louisiana claimed that if American Muslims “want to set up their own culture and values, that’s not immigration, that’s really invasion.”

No matter how anxious people may be about Islam, the notion of a Muslim invasion of this majority Christian country has no basis in fact. Moreover, there is an inconvenient footnote to the assertion that Islam is anti-American: Muslims arrived here before the founding of the United States — not just a few, but thousands.

They have been largely overlooked because they were not free to practice their faith. They were not free themselves and so they were for the most part unable to leave records of their beliefs. They left just enough to confirm that Islam in America is not an immigrant religion lately making itself known, but a tradition with deep roots here, despite being among the most suppressed in the nation’s history.

In 1528, a Moroccan slave called Estevanico was shipwrecked along with a band of Spanish explorers near the future city of Galveston, Tex. The city of Azemmour, in which he was raised, had been a Muslim stronghold against European invasion until it fell during his youth. While given a Christian name after his enslavement, he eventually escaped his Christian captors and set off on his own through much of the Southwest.

Two hundred years later, plantation owners in Louisiana made it a point to add enslaved Muslims to their labor force, relying on their experience with the cultivation of indigo and rice. Scholars have noted Muslim names and Islamic religious titles in the colony’s slave inventories and death records.

The best known Muslim to pass through the port at New Orleans was Abdul-Rahman Ibrahim ibn Sori, a prince in his homeland whose plight drew wide attention. As one newspaper account noted, he had read the Bible and admired its precepts, but added, “His principal objections are that Christians do not follow them.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/09/opinion/the-founding-muslims.html?action=click&contentCollection=Europe&module=MostEmailed&version=Full&region=Marginalia&src=me&pgtype=article

Posted By F. Sheikh

‘Good Lovers Lie’ By Clancy Martin in NYT

VALENTINE’S DAY is not a celebration of truth telling. God forbid! Relationships last only if we don’t always say exactly what we’re thinking. We have to disguise our feelings, to feint, to smile sometimes when we want to shout. In short, we have to lie.

We all tell lies, and tell them shockingly often: Research shows that on average in an ordinary conversation, people lie two to three times every 10 minutes. (It makes you want to be completely silent for a day or two just to throw off the statistics — but what about lies by omission?) And we lie particularly often when it comes to love, because we care more about love than we care about most things, and because love causes us more fear than most things do, and caring and fearing are two of the most common reasons for lying.

The people who find themselves most betrayed by the lies of lovers are those who have the most unrealistic expectations about truthfulness. And the people who are most inclined to believe the lies they shouldn’t are the ones who tell themselves the biggest lie of them all: “I never tell lies.”

If you want to have love in your life, you’d better be prepared to tell some lies and to believe some lies. If honesty is what matters most to you, you might as well embrace a life of silence and become a Trappist monk. These are, of course, options: Immanuel Kant, who argued that it was always wrong to lie, was a lifelong bachelor. And the notorious misanthrope Arthur Schopenhauer, also a champion of truthfulness and opponent of romantic love — he argued that to marry meant to do everything possible to disgust each other — saved his greatest devotion for his uninterrupted string of poodles.

But most of us do want to love and to be loved. So what are these lies we should tell and believe?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/opinion/sunday/good-lovers-lie.html?ref=opinion

 

Posted by F. Sheikh

Andrew Small on the China-Pakistan Relationship

Andrew Small, a policy researcher at the German Marshall Fund of the United States in Washington, explores China’s ties with Pakistan in a new book that delves into the relationship’s history, the Chinese origins of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, extremism in the two countries and how the future might develop as the United States recedes from Pakistan and Afghanistan.

In his book, “The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia’s New Geopolitics,” Mr. Small argues that although China has long been close to Pakistan — thanks in part to shared mistrust of India — there have always been irritants below the surface. The presence in remote areas of Pakistan of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, founded by separatists from the Uighur ethnic minority native to the western Chinese region of Xinjiang, is especially troubling to Beijing. China is suspicious, he says, that elements in the Pakistani Army harbor sympathies for the Uighurs.

The book is especially timely as President Xi Jinping is expected to visit Pakistan soon, perhaps for Pakistan Day celebrations at the end of March. Chinese presidents do not visit Pakistan often, only about once a decade. If, as expected, Mr. Xi goes to Pakistan and bypasses India, the trip could open a new chapter in the relationship. Following are excerpts from an interview with Mr. Small:

Q.

What prompted you to write about Pakistan and China, an important relationship but rarely written about in full?

I was frustrated with the lack of authoritative material on a friendship that I believe is so important to the understanding of Chinese foreign policy, the future of Pakistan and Afghanistan, and the prospects for the U.S.-China relationship. The Pakistani Army’s assault on Islamabad’s Red Mosque in 2007, the incident that opens the book, pulled many of these strands together. While the United States had been pushing Pakistan for years to mount a crackdown on various extremist groups, it was pressure from Beijing that ultimately played the decisive role, following the kidnapping of Chinese “massage workers” by Red Mosque militants. For all the tensions between Washington and Beijing in East Asia, the region to China’s west is an area where the two sides have important interests in common and where Chinese assertiveness, especially in dealing with its Pakistani friends, is generally very welcome. But in practice it has been extremely difficult to draw China out on these issues, not least because of Beijing’s close, secretive and carefully protected relationship with Pakistan.
I wanted to figure out how the rising threat of Islamic militancy was reshaping China’s approach in this region, and to try to get to the facts behind the most mythologized stories — China’s nuclear relationship with the Pakistanis and the Saudis, China’s dealings with the Taliban, China’s plans for naval bases in the Indian Ocean, and so on — that affect calculations about so many different global security concerns, but where definitive answers have been so hard to come by.
Q.

China is quite worried about the terror threat from Pakistan, and particularly dislikes the fact that the East Turkestan Islamic Movement operates in Pakistan’s tribal areas. Why does China not exert more pressure on the Pakistanis about harboring the ETIM? Was the recent Pakistani offensive into North Waziristan inspired in part by the Chinese?

A.

The ETIM issue has been the biggest source of tension between China and Pakistan in recent years, and behind closed doors the pressure from Beijing at a number of different junctures has been pretty strong. Among the examples are the run-up to the 2008 Olympics, the run-up to the 60th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China and after various incidents in Xinjiang that appeared to have cross-border involvement.

Nevertheless, there are plenty of officials on the Chinese side who bought the argument from the Pakistanis that an operation in North Waziristan was difficult to mount and potentially ill-advised. There were also doubts about whether a rather small number of ETIM fighters could really do very much harm sitting out there in the tribal areas. As the terrorist violence in and beyond Xinjiang has worsened though, especially after the attacks in Beijing and Kunming over the last 18 months, patience has worn thin. While the direct involvement of ETIM in the attacks on the Chinese mainland remains in doubt, North Waziristan had become a propaganda hub. And, although there were many reasons for the launch of the offensive there, it was certainly encouraged by China. There are even recent stories that Beijing has suggested conducting joint military operations with the Pakistanis. China is suspicious that, in the lower ranks of the Pakistani Army, there are sympathies with the Uighurs, and has complained in recent years about warnings being given before operations are conducted, a phenomenon that is quite familiar to the U.S. side.

http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/06/q-and-a-andrew-small-on-the-china-pakistan-relationship/?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

 

   

Mummified monk in Mongolia ‘not dead’, say Buddhists – BBC News

Subject: Mummified monk in Mongolia ‘not dead’, say Buddhists – BBC News
Faith and medicine with a different perspective.  

http://m.bbc.com/news/world-asia-31125338