The Left in Pakistan-4-Mujib to BD, Bhutto Rules a Fiefdom

Mujib was lodged in a suite of rooms at the Claridge Hotel assigned to heads of state. The suite was immediately swamped by well-wishers, inundated by phone calls from BD, Indra Gandhi and the British PM Edward Heath, among scores of other callers. Mujib’s suite soon became the nerve center of BD government. He wanted to rest for a few days after nine months of solitary confinement.

Anthony Mascarenhas in his book “Bangla Desh, A Legacy of Blood” claims that Mujib had made a deal with Bhutto to maintain some kind of link with Pakistan. His comrades in arms were not prepared to countenance any linkage with the erstwhile parent country.

Mujib had been kept in a cell with out any radio, TV or newspapers, and was not even allowed to talk to his jailers. He was unaware of the genocide perpetrated by the Pakistan army. The truth would not sink in till he reached Dhaka. He had to forego the little time off he needed for recuperation. A virtual insurgency had developed among the different factions in the government being run in his name in BD.

After the surrender of the Pakistan army to the Indian forces, Mujib’s assistants returned in triumph to, the Independent state of Bangla Desh, and installed themselves as the provisional government of the republic. A definitive establishment would have to await Mujib’s return.  They behaved as all revolutionary governments do; sought revenge, put opponents in jail, conducted kangaroo court trials, appropriated property, businesses, and even houses of their opponents. Urdu speaking people became the special targets.

The situation was saved from degenerating into mass starvation, rampant epidemics, and enormous loss of life by the unprecedented scale of international help, and by the logistic support provided by the Indian army.

About half a million Urdu speaking persons had been left stranded. They were herded, for security, into hastily erected refugee camps. They were legally Pakistani citizens, and did not want to relinquish the citizenship. BD did not want them, though at one point an offer to grant citizenship to those born in Bengal was made. It was not taken up. Pakistan did not want to accept them either. They became stateless- South Asian equivalent of Palestinian refugees. They did not even have the consolation of being able to put the blame on “the infidel”. Their fellow Muslims-Pakistanis and Bangla Deshis had turned away from them.

Pakistan had to accept their claim of citizenship, but pleaded lack of resources for their repatriation and resettlement. Saudi and other gulf Governments set up a trust fund for the purpose.

The province of Punjab offered to take them all if housing, jobs and means of sustenance could be provided for them. Finances were not a problem.  Muslim potentate’s largesse had seen to that.

But Sindhis were apprehensive that regardless of where these Urdu speakers were initially resettled, they would eventually gravitate to its cities. With the addition of the “Biharis”, as the Pakistanis left behind came to be called, the balance of population too would be tilted to against them. They started talking of being “Red Indianized”.

A few thousand houses were, nevertheless, built in the Punjab, and those with close relations in Pakistan were repatriated. Some made their way to Pakistan by bribing the border guards. The rest, over one hundred thousand in number (2006), clinging to the fiction of Pakistani Citizenship, are still languishing in UNO refugee camps. There is poor sanitation, little education, and deplorable lack of any purposeful activity in the Camps. A few have taken to doing jobs illegally.

The whole atmosphere is that of sloth, hopelessness, despair, and dejection. Moral turpitude is prevalent. “Sex” work is common.

Trust funds for their rehabilitation have, in the meanwhile, grown enormously. In 2004, they amounted to over 500 million US Dollars. In 2004, some camp residents, born since independence of BD (1971) moved the courts in the country that they should be entitled, under international law, to citizenship of the country. The courts agreed with the request and directed the BD Government to offer them citizenship. Some well meaning Pakistanis are (2006) planning a Quixotic appeal to the Supreme Court of Pakistan to order the Government of the country to accept the “stranded” Pakistanis.

The repatriates from the then East Pakistan, did gravitate to Karachi, and live in a vast sprawling make shift colony on the out skirts of the city. They have little by way of civic amenities. They are, however, an enterprising community and have established a large number of cottage industries making garments, weaving cloth, metal works, you name it. They were trained in sabotage, bomb making, espionage and other such activities by the Pakistan armed forces to fight the BD insurgents. They put the training to good use in periodic confrontations with the police, army and other security agencies. They also played a large role in ethnic riots promoted by Zia, which were to break out in Karachi during his dictatorship. They also proved a great source of strength to the ethnic Mohajir party that Zia is believed to have sponsored.  The matter would be discussed in detail later in the narrative. Suffice it to say at this point, that they contributed to the use of firearms in political affairs.

A large number of ethnic Bengalis were to migrate illegally to Pakistan. They live in Karachi and other urban centers in Sindh and do menial work. They are exploited by employers, victimized by security agencies and looked down upon by other ethnic elements. Many when compared to the average Bengalis are tall and fair. They are believed to be the products of the “Genetic Modification” practiced under the aegis of the butcher of Bengal.

The population of the country is, though, now less than that of Pakistan. The greater population of Bengal had always been a bone of contention. BD government was remarkably successful in promoting family planning. Frequent cyclones, hurricanes, floods, epidemics and poor living condition also worked the attrition. But it was too late to keep the old country in one piece.

One private venture the Grameen Bank lends small amounts of money to finance small home based industries like garment making etc. But that is a drop in the ocean.

In Pakistan, Bhutto took full advantage of the humiliation of the armed forces. He retired many in the top brass, and exiled others to comfortable sinecures as ambassadors.

He changed the designation of service Chiefs from that of Commander in Chief (C-in-C), which he called a relic of the colonial past, to that of Chief of the staff (COS). A new post, Chief of Joint Staff was created, but its occupant had only an advisory capacity.

On the civilian front, Bhutto tried to break the back of the entrenched bureaucracy.. He had lists of undesirable functionaries prepared. The criteria for inclusion in the list varied from the highest offence of ever disobeying the man himself to crossing the path of the lowliest PPP partisan. Corruption and inefficiency were prominent in being absent from the list.

Bhutto changed colonial designations of first to fourth class government servants to grades from 1 to 22.   Special cadres, like administration, police and customs, were organized. Previously a Superior services officer could be a magistrate, judge, a district collector, secretary of a department or serve in the Foreign Service. Now the successful entrants had to stay in their field. He also let professionals be promoted to senior most ranks. A Doctor could, for example become Secretary of Health ministry, an engineer secretary of communications and so on.

Under the pretext of attracting talent, he appointed favorites directly, with out the benefit of any experience, to senior bureaucratic positions. This procedure was called lateral entry.

There is little doubt the civil was rigid hierarchy.  Code of behavior was etched in stone. Above all, they were nearly complete segregated from ordinary mortals. A new patriotic institution needed to be created. But Bhutto went after the form much more than the substance. By introducing a few sycophants into the higher reaches of the service, he could not possibly change the “ruling class” mentality.

On the political front Bhutto offered a liberal democratic constitution. He even conceded the demands of the opposition that if he wanted executive powers; he should step down from the office of the President.

A constitutional draft was presented to the parliament. After careful deliberations, the ruling group accepted most of the amendments presented by the opposition. The document was passed by a unanimous vote in 1973. After the President had signed the document, martial law was lifted

In a malicious and Machiavellian display of bad faith, soon after the constitution had been passed, he declared a state of emergency, suspended civil rights, curtailed the authority of courts to entertain cases against the Government, and for all practical purposes set aside constitutional law. The opposition cried foul, but they were helpless

Bhutto ran the country as a fiefdom. It is widely believed that the head of a leading religious party, a venerable old man, was sexually assaulted while in jail. Bhutto personally threatened a high court judge with dire consequences, and pointedly referred to his daughter who went to college every day.

He was to haunt Bhutto later as a member of the panel of judges, which tried him for allegedly ordering murder of a political opponent.

His first law minister Mahmood Qusuri, author of the 1973 constitution, appeared to grow too big for his britches. He was sacked with the usual admonition to take care lest things were to happen to the females of the family.

Bhutto was one of the prime initiators of the “disappeared technique” of public policy. It was later to be practiced on a wide scale in Chile, and other South American countries. Hundreds were discovered in concentration camps in the early Zia period.             Another close associate, a noted student leader Mairaj Khan, who had been helpful in catapulting Bhutto into limelight after Ayub had sacked the latter, and had cajoled the left/progressives into casting their lot with the man, fell out with the boss.  To assert his newfound independent status, he joined a trade union procession. He was mercilessly beaten up by the police. He set something of a record.  I have not been able to find a precedent, in non-communist countries, when a sitting minister had been man handled by the police. (In later years, the mayor of Karachi was punched in the face by a police officer.  I have the pictures of his bleeding face of the dignitary on file). Mustafa Khar latter, after ruling the roost as governor of the Punjab, was in his turn, taken from his house, and left stranded in a remote area, with no roads and little traffic.  He had to walk about twenty miles before he could find a bullock cart driver to give him a lift to a town.

Bhutto had given catchy slogans of: Roti, Kapra aur Makan” roughly bread, clothes and house for all. He also declared that factories and mills belonged to workers. On his ascension to power the workers in many factories had taken him at his word.  They took over the work place in many industries, and in many instances locked the owners and administrators in their offices as punishment. Instances of verbal abuse hurled at the erstwhile masters were not uncommon. In a few cases the bosses were kept with out food or water for extended periods of time. This was termed “Gherao”, encirclement. Police dare not intervene, as the outrage was supposed to have the big chief’s sanction.  Instances of actual physical assault of the persons of the bosses were rare though.

Bhutto maintained a lavish court. Drunken orgies, wife swapping, and seduction of the wives of associates were reported to be common.

Bhutto had appointed Zia chief of the army after the Butcher of Bengal retired. He had given the man the top job over the heads of several generals senior to him. Zia was widely regarded as a mediocrity. He used to follow Bhutto like a loyal henchman, usually with a tray of whisky in his hands. He was to change colors later and launch a pseudo-theocratic state.

Perhaps the greatest disservice he did to the country was to rekindle the animosity between the older inhabitants of Sind and the newer ones who had migrated from India. The immigrants controlled most of the business and industry, education and professions.     The print media, dependent on Government advertisements for their daily bread, never virile in Pakistan, was reduced to abject servility. Radio and TV were under Government control already. One could easily dub the media, Bhutto voice.

He used state machinery to lavish favors on people who had done him a good turn in the days of his adversity. I have personal knowledge of one such examples.

In 1989 one of my class mates from Quetta College came to visit me in Karachi, and asked me, with an air of a person who had great and extra ordinary news to impart, if I remembered so and so from Quetta. I did. He then asked me if I had any idea what the man did now. I did not. The man, my friend blurted out, was a Judge of the Punjab High Court.  It was my turn to be astounded at the news. After passing the 12th grade examination with low grades, he had gone to Lahore where he managed to get an undergraduate degree and a degree in Law with similar ranking.

He took to frequenting the meetings Bhutto addressed, and made speeches in the latter’s favor in Bar association. Bhutto on ascension to power had appointed him to a lower court, from which perch he had, over the course of time, ascended the departmental ladder. He eventually rose to a seat in the Supreme Court!

Bhutto was bright and educated enough to understand that the feudal system and Capitalism were contradiction in terms.

Bhutto had given populist socialist slogans before assuming power. Workers had shown him the way by taking over industries. He nationalized- read expropriated- industries, banks, schools, commercial concerns, even cottage industries like flour mills. Capitalists fled the country. Most had stashed a good portion of their wealth in Foreign Banks and had large investments in real estate in London, NY and other major cities.

Banking was one of the more efficient and robust sections of commerce in Pakistan.  They offered good service, employed efficient persons, even some talented ones in the upper echelons, and were profitable enterprises. They had flourishing business in the UK and the USA and catered to the needs of expatriates who preferred to deal with them rather the native Banks. After nationalization, hundreds of millions in loans, with out any collateral, were given to sycophants, relatives and hangers on of the ruling clique.

Private schools, a relic of the colonial past, run by Churches, and a few other parochial groups provided high standard education for the progeny of the elite. They also accepted a few talented students from the middle and poorer classes.   Minority communities such as Parsis (Zoroastrians)[xxxv] managed a few schools as well.  The Government took them over. They started, like the government schools, churning out semi literate unemployable degree holders. Church and a few other high-powered schools managed to retrieve control, but many other less well connected they were reduced to low standards.

Bhutto convened a meeting of the heads of all Muslim countries in Lahore. He used the cover of the moot to obtain a “consensus from the conference to recognize BD”, publicly embraced Mujib, and buried the fictional existence of “United” Pakistan.

Bhutto was an expert at grandstanding. India had exploded a “peaceful” nuclear device in 1974. Bhutto had pledged a thousand years war with India.

The successful conference of the Muslim countries gave Bhutto a great boost.

             Bhutto fell victim to a delusion common to all tin pot dictators; he started taking his own bombast seriously and made a critical mistake.1

He called a conference of all the nuclear physicists of the country and demanded that they produce a workable nuclear device in the next four to five years. The nuclear scientists in Pakistan were, one and all, jaded bureaucrats living a comfortable life in cushy sinecures.

The group of scientists humbly expressed their inability to deliver the goods, proffering the valid excuse of lack of equipment, infra structure, technical staff, laboratories and supplies. He heaped obscene abuses on them and literally shouted them out of the Shamiana. Tail between legs, they slinked out.

.               A Pakistani metallurgist, A.Qadeer Khan, was worked in the translation department in a nuclear reprocessing plant in Holland. Married to a Dutch lady, he was trusted by his employers. That gave him unlimited access to all the records. He wrote to Bhutto that if he was given a personal audience, he could suggest a method of achieving the goal dearest to all their heart. Bhutto sent word to the man to present himself forthwith.

Qadeer brought photocopies of the relevant documents and a complete list of supplies, equipment, and materiel.  Bhutto ensconced him in a secure location, ordered that phony companies be set up to smuggle supplies in, and the man be given the highest priority in all he needed.  Khan turned out to be true to his word. He produced the bomb in about five years though due to the fear of international opprobrium the device could not be tested.

USA has always been obsessed with proliferation and of the exclusivity of the nuclear club[xxxvi]. Kissinger saw red in Bhutto’s plans to develop an atomic bomb and flew to Pakistan to upbraid the latter. Bhutto blandly denied the whole affair. Kissinger, as arrogant as they come, was incensed. He told Bhutto that the latter was insulting his intelligence, and that unless he ceased and desisted “we would make a horrible example of you”[xxxvii].  The confrontation with Kissinger sealed his fate

COLLEGE ADMISSION’S AND VISA RED TAPE

.Shared by Ajaz.

Pakistan’s 15-year-old record-breaker struggles to find university place

2sitara_burooj_akbar_rabwah_ahmadiyya_chenabnagar_pakistani

The brightest 15-year-old in the world can’t find a place at university because she’s too young.

Sitara Brooj Akbar moved from Rabwah, Pakistan to the UAE last year after breaking international records in passing examinations.

She is the youngest pupil to reach the top level, Band 9, in the International English Language Testing System. IELTS Band 9 qualifies her as an “expert user” of English, with “full operational command of the language: appropriate, accurate and fluent with complete understanding”.

Top universities in the United States and Britain, including Harvard, Yale, Oxford and Cambridge, require an IELTS grade of only Band 7 – but Sitara is not old enough for a visa.

“The universities there cannot sponsor a student or offer them a student visa if they are under the age of 18. There is an age restriction on university students because of visa regulations,” she said.

Sitara’s exam record-breaking began at the age of 9, when she became the youngest Pakistani to pass O-level chemistry. At 10, she set a world record by passing O-level biology.

She passed O-level English, physics and mathematics at 11, becoming the youngest child in the world to pass five O levels. She then sat A levels at the age of 13.

Even more remarkably, Sitara achieved her exam success without setting foot inside a school since the third grade.

sitara_burooj_akbar_rabwah_ahmadiyya_chenabnagar_pakistani“My parents realised that I could not learn in a traditional school learning environment, so they opted for home learning,” she said.

“I have done most of my studies sitting at a shelf in the kitchen while my mother was cooking.”

Sitara, the eldest of five children from a Punjab province,moved to Sharjah with her family nine months ago in search of higher education.

But high tuition fees proved beyond her family’s means, and the visa regulations mean she cannot study abroad.

“I have applied to all the leading universities in the USA and UK but they respond with one sentence: that they are very impressed with my academic accomplishments but I am too young to get a student visa,” Sitara said.

The British Council UAE is trying to help. “Despite Sitara’s very exceptional educational track record, her young age is a barrier,” said Faraz Waqar, its head of marketing and communications.

“Undergraduate programmes in the UK and around the world currently do not accept people as young as her. We at the British Council will try our best to guide and help Sitara towards her eventual educational goal. There are no guarantees, we can only try.

“We wish her the very best for her bright future. She deserves all the support after all her efforts and struggle.”

Sitara’s ambition is to be a researcher in biochemistry. “There are many mysteries unsolved and many cures yet to be found; I want to make my contribution to humanity through science.” Her father said they moved to UAE so that Sitara could obtain the best education.

[RabwahTimes]

A SUCCINT HISTORY OF KASHMIR’S DEADLY STRIFE

Share by Nasik Elahi

SRINAGAR, India (AP) — When news spread that Indian troops had killed 22-year-old Burhan Wani, a charismatic commander of Indian-controlled Kashmir’s biggest rebel group on July 8, the public response was spontaneous and unprecedented. Tens of thousands of angry youths poured out of their homes in towns and villages across the Himalayan region, hurling rocks and bricks and clashing with Indian troops.

A curfew and a communications blackout has failed to stop the protests. The violence has left 48 civilians dead as government forces fired live ammunition and pellets to try to quell the unrest. About 2,000 civilians and 1,500 police and soldiers have been injured in the clashes.

But Kashmir’s fury at Indian rule is not new. The stunning mountain region has known little other than conflict since 1947, when British rule of the subcontinent ended with the creation of India and Pakistan.

___

THE HISTORY

The Himalayan kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir was asked to become part of one of the two newly independent nations. But Maharaja Hari Singh, the unpopular Hindu ruler of the Muslim-majority region, wanted to stay independent.

A raid by tribesmen from northwestern Pakistan forced Singh to seek help from India, which offered military assistance on condition that the kingdom accede to India. The ruler accepted but insisted that Kashmir remain a largely autonomous state within the Indian union, with India managing its foreign affairs, defense, and telecommunications.

The Indian military entered the region soon after, and the tribal raid spiraled into the first of two wars between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. The war ended in 1948 with a U.N.-brokered ceasefire. Nonetheless, Kashmir became divided between the two young nations by a heavily militarized Line of Control, with the promise of U.N.-sponsored referendum in the future.

In Indian-controlled Kashmir, many saw the transition as the mere transfer of power from their Hindu king to Hindu-majority India. Kashmiri discontent against India started taking root as successive Indian governments breached the pact of Kashmir’s autonomy. Local governments were toppled one after another, and largely peaceful movements against Indian control curbed harshly.

Pakistan continued raising the Kashmir dispute in international forums, including in the U.N. India began calling the region its integral part, saying that Kashmir’s lawmakers had ratified the accession to New Delhi.

As the deadlock persisted, India and Pakistan went to war again in 1965, with little changing on the ground. Several rounds of talks followed, but the impasse continued.

In the mid-1980s, dissident political groups in Indian Kashmir united and contest elections for the state assembly. The Muslim United Front quickly emerged as a formidable force against Kashmir’s pro-India political elite. However, the front lost the 1987 election, widely believed to have been heavily rigged.

A strong public backlash followed. Some young MUF activists crossed over to Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, where the Pakistani military began arming and training Kashmiri nationalists.

By 1989, Kashmir was in the throes of a full-blown rebellion.

India poured in more troops into the already heavily militarized region. In response, thousands of Kashmiris streamed back from the Pakistani-controlled portion with guns and grenades. More than 68,000 people have been killed since then.

Though the militancy waned, popular sentiment for “azadi,” or freedom, has remained ingrained in the Kashmiri psyche. In the last decade, the region has made a transition from armed rebellion to unarmed uprisings as tens of thousands of civilians frequently take to the streets to protest Indian rule, often leading to clashes between rock-throwing residents and Indian troops. The protests are quelled by deadly force.

___

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

In 2008, a government decision — later revoked — to transfer land to a Hindu shrine in Kashmir set off a summer of protests. The following year, the alleged rape and murder of two young women by government forces set off fresh violence.

In 2010, the trigger for protests was a police investigation into allegations that soldiers shot dead three civilians and then staged a fake gunbattle to make it appear the dead were militants and claim rewards for the killings.

In all three years, hundreds of thousands of young men and women took to the streets, hurling rocks and abuse at Indian forces. At least 200 people were killed and hundreds wounded as troops fired iknto the crowds, inciting further protests.

The crackdown appears to be pushing many educated young Kashmiris, who grew up politically radicalized amid decades of brutal conflict, toward armed rebel groups. Young Kashmiri boys began snatching weapons from Indian forces and training themselves deep inside Kashmir’s forests.

The number of militants has, however, remained minuscule, not crossing 200 in the last several years.

___

ANTI-INDIA GROUPS

The All Parties Hurriyat Conference is a conglomerate of social, religious and political groups formed in 1993. It advocates the U.N.-sponsored right to self-determination for Kashmir or tripartite talks between India, Pakistan and Kashmiri leadership to resolve the dispute.

The Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front, or JKLF, was one of the first armed rebel groups. It favors an independent, united Kashmir. Currently led by Mohammed Yasin Malik, the group gave up armed rebellion in 1994, soon after Indian authorities released Malik from jail after four years.

ews/ap-explains-69-years-kashmir-043600837.html

‘Failed Coup In Turkey’ Brief Thought By F. Sheikh

The military forces in most of the Muslim lands think that their top priority is to protect the citizens from its politicians and not to protect the country from its enemy for which they were hired. The Military thinks itself to be an elite class that deserves all the perks, supported by major portion of the national economy, and whatever is left, should be used for the rest of the country. The military tries its best that politicians do not succeed and undermines the democratic process and its institutions by all means necessary. Unfortunately the politicians of Muslim countries are also corrupt, but their corruption is a fraction of what military corruption takes away from the national economy.  

Military dictators suited us, USA and the West, well for decades and we supported them with all means at the expense of oppression of masses. The current unravelling and violent extremism is part of that legacy. In the panic of current chaos, we are trying to go back to old days and old ways which created the current mess in the first place. We supported the return of military dictator General Sissi in Egypt and now we were hoping against hope that military coup will succeed in Turkey. Mr. Roger Cohen writes in NYT,    

Jonathan Eyal, the international director at Britain’s Royal United Services Institute, told me. There can be little doubt the expressions of support for Erdogan from western capitals came through gritted teeth”

This is a self-defeating strategy. We should support democratic forces and process in all its forms in these countries and should not choose and impose winners of our liking in these countries, because it will not only infuriate the general masses in Muslim countries but also give opportunities to violent extremist elements to exploit the situation for their own evil designs. The democratic process should continue, no matter how messy, and we should not support military dictators in any form.  

In old days whatever cruelty happened in Muslim lands due to oppressive dictators, stayed in those lands, now its repercussions will spill over in the rest of the world, especially in the west-and may be in most violent extremist ways.